Fante’s Inferno now has a YouTube channel and my first video has published!
Episode 1 will post this week. Please check it out and subscribe!
Fante’s Inferno now has a YouTube channel and my first video has published!
Episode 1 will post this week. Please check it out and subscribe!
Fante’s Inferno celebrates summer movie going with a look back at the films of the Summer of 1984.
Release Date: June 8, 1984
Directed by Ivan Reitman; Screenplay by Dan Aykroyd and Harold Ramis
Starring Bill Murray, Dan Aykroyd, Harold Ramis, Sigourney Weaver, Rick Moranis, Ernie Hudson, William Atherton, Annie Potts
For the three years that I’ve been writing my retrospectives on the films of the Summers of 1982, 1983 and now 1984, whether it’s the summer’s biggest blockbuster or one of the smaller hidden gems, there’s always been that one film in each year’s summer lineup that I look forward to reviewing the most. The Summer of ’84 had a very strong lineup of high grossing crowd pleasers (particularly Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom and Gremlins), but the film that stands out the most from that summer is Ivan Reitman’s classic supernatural comedy Ghostbusters.
When I first saw Ghostbusters on the Summer of ’84’s lineup, my first thought was “How the heck has it been thirty years?!” (a sentiment shared by many of my friends). It doesn’t feel like that much time has passed because countless screenings of Ghostbusters over the years have kept it fresh in my mind. I’ve seen the film more times than any other released during the Summer of ’84 and I still quote some of the more memorable lines (say “Don’t cross the streams” to anyone over 40 and they’ll immediately get the Ghostbusters reference).
The film begins with a librarian experiencing an encounter with a ghost in the New York Public Library. Dr. Ray Stantz (Dan Aykroyd) drags Dr. Peter Venkman (Bill Murray) from his shady student research experiment to investigate the occurrence with Dr. Egon Spengler (Harold Ramis). They encounter the ghost first hand, and return to their office at Columbia University to find their equipment being removed and their funding cut off due to questionable research and dubious results. Confronted with the prospect of never working in academia again and having to find work in the private sector, Venkman proposes they strike out on their own and start a company dedicated to catching ghosts. Dana Barrett (Sigourney Weaver) contacts the Ghostbusters when she opens her refrigerator and finds another dimension and a demonic dog. Smitten, Venkman takes a personal interest in her case. After a slow start, business picks up with a high level of paranormal activity in New York City, but they’re shut down by the EPA for unlicensed equipment and the ectoplasm hits the fan.
The last time I saw Ghostbusters was during the pre-CGI era and its effects were still pretty cutting edge. Going into this week’s screening I had to prepare myself that the effects of Ghostbusters, while amazing back in the 80’s, would look dated by today’s standards. Watching Ghostbusters again this week I realized my reservations were unfounded. The film is just as enjoyable today because it’s the story and the cast that make this movie great. The effects are secondary to Aykroyd and Ramis’s script, Reitman’s direction and a talented cast. Bill Murray is the anchor of the Ghostbusters as Dr. Peter Venkman but the rest of the cast doesn’t take the back seat, with each actor elevating the comedy by adding their own genius: the everyman quality of Dan Aykroyd’s Dr. Ray Stantz, the late, great Harold Ramis’ deadpan Dr. Igon Spengler, to the supporting characters played by Sigourney Weaver as the Ghostbusters client and Venkman’s love interest Dana Barrett, her dorky accountant neighbor Louis played by Rick Moranis, Ernie Hudson as their newhire Winston Zeddmore, and William Atherton as the arrogant EPA bureaucrat Walter Peck.
I remember watching Ghostbusters in the theater back in June of 1984. It opened the same weekend as Joe Dante’s Gremlins, which is surprising considering even with that direct competition and their neck and neck battle for the weekend box office ($13.6 million for Ghostbusters to $12.5 million for Gremlins) Ghostbusters still grossed over $200 million as the top grossing film of the summer and the #2 grossing film of 1984. It’s easy to see why both films were favorites of my generation, they’re both fun movies that were perfect for summer. But in the long run I understand why Ghostbusters would prevail as the more popular film because it was more accessible to an adult audience, while Gremlins feels like more of a guilty pleasure.
I may have seen Gremlins in the theater first, but that didn’t take away from the enjoyment of watching Ghostbusters that wonderful summer. One thing I enjoyed the most when I revisited Ghostbusters this week was that I was able to pick up on a number of one-liners that would have been over my head at age 12. I also enjoyed the fact that for the first time since June 1984 I was able to see Ghostbusters as it was meant to be seen in letterbox format rather than the pan and scan version that was on cable TV and home video for over 20 years. I was able to overlook the dated special effects because despite the supernatural/paranormal aspect of the story, the movie wasn’t as heavy on the visual effects as I thought. Had the film been shot today (or rather, when the reboot is filmed in the next couple of years), CGI would have dominated the screen and at the end of the day would only look fake. In spite of CGI’s ability to create a whole world out of a green screen shot, in many cases it only ends up being a distraction rather than a seamless effect because it just doesn’t look “right.”
On that note I have to say it was quite refreshing to see New York City as it was in 1984. The establishing shot of New York Public Library at the beginning of the film is hidden by scaffolding because maintenance work was actually being done on the facade at that time. If shot today the scaffolding would have been magically removed by CGI and a majority of the cityscape would have been painted in. I loved just seeing New York as it was shot on a hard negative, particularly that every corner of Manhattan you saw in Ghostbusters wasn’t dominated by a bank, pharmacy or Starbucks.
I guess the main purpose of my revisiting Ghostbusters this week wasn’t to see if it still holds up 30 years later, because every screening of this classic comedy has been equally enjoyable for me over the years. What I really found myself thinking more than anything was the lost opportunity to get four comedic geniuses back together for a third installment of one of the great comedies of the 80’s. Murray, Ramis, Aykroyd and Reitman are at the top of their games for Ghostbusters, which makes the fact that they’ll never all be in Ghostbusters 3 all the more heartbreaking for fans of the first two. There’s been talk of Bridesmaids director Paul Feig in discussions for a reboot of Ghostbusters, possibly with an all female cast. As funny as that film might be, and as much money as it might gross, it wouldn’t provide the same sense of anticipation of a sequel or the nostalgia of the joy of watching the first two Ghostbusters films. In my humble opinion the Ghostbusters are Dan Aykroyd, Bill Murray, Harold Ramis and Ernie Hudson. Without them and Ivan Reitman, a reboot just doesn’t have the soul of a beloved original. And without them, who you gonna call?
On Thursday April 17th my hometown movie theater, the Mamaroneck Playhouse, closed its doors and will eventually be torn down for condos. Built in 1925 as a vaudeville theater, it’s been the center of Mamaroneck’s business district for 89 years. The news was a surprise to everyone back home, with property owner Bow Tie Cinemas breaking the news to local officials only the night before. According to the company, the playhouse wasn’t economically sustainable, but Mamaroneck residents (and former residents such as myself) are skeptical of that claim considering it’s a first run theater in a vibrant business district, surrounded by a variety of restaurants and parking.
The films I’ve seen there over my lifetime range from blockbusters (E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial), to the obscure (Raise the Titanic), to some titles better forgotten (lest I be judged…). Even though the last film I saw there was back in 2001 (The Curse of the Jade Scorpion), most of the films I’ve written about on Fante’s Inferno were originally screened at the Mamaroneck Playhouse.
I’ve seen the theater evolve from a single screen with balcony seating to a four screen multiplex almost 35 years ago. Most of the films I’ve seen there were in the 80’s, but my favorite era of the Mamaroneck Playhouse was the mid-to-late 70’s when it was still only one screen. Not necessarily because the movies were better, but because of the old school memories of the ushers walking up and down the aisles, shining their flashlights into the faces of anyone who dared to talk during the movie or put their feet up on the seats. At one point in my early years attending that theater, they actually sold comic books on a spinner rack in the lobby. By 1980 it was chopped up into four separate theaters, a crime in and of itself for altering the classic interior.
In honor of the now closed Mamaroneck Playhouse, here are a few of my favorite films screened there over the last 42 years:
Released in theaters in 1975, but screened as part of a double feature with Jaws 2 at the Mamaroneck Playhouse in the Summer of 1978.
When I think back to the night I saw this film back in 1980, I’m reminded of how even the greatest comedy is funnier with the laughter of others around you.
Flash Gordon (1980)
This was a fun movie to see in the theater back in 1980. A lot of folks in the theater didn’t quite “get” it, but those of us in the sci-fi/D&D crowd appreciated it on every level, from the production design and special effects to Queen’s still amazing score.
Time Bandits (1981)
My introduction to the films and genius of Terry Gilliam. Still one of my all time favorite films.
The Goonies (1985)
A fun movie, and a great movie memory. Four friends sitting in the front row of a matinee in an empty theater during the start of summer vacation. A coke in one hand, a bag of Twizzlers in the other. When I think of summer moviegoing, that’s the first memory that comes to mind.
By the time my brother and I were finally able to see the X-Men on the big screen, we had waited about 20 years from when an X-Men film was first announced. It was worth the wait.
The picture above is how I will always remember the Mamaroneck Playhouse. My main concerns over the theater closing its doors are less nostalgic than they are cultural. The business district lost its book shop several years back, and now its movie theater is gone. Sure, higher ticket prices, home video/theater systems and the lower standards of movie theater etiquette have kept people home in recent years, but one element of moviegoing enjoyment has been the sense of community. I remember one Saturday night back in the early 80’s when it seemed like half of the audience was made up of our friends and neighbors. Despite the access to many amazing and obscure films since I’ve moved to New York City, that’s one feeling I haven’t been able to experience as a moviegoer here.
I haven’t seen a movie at the Mamaroneck Playhouse in over a decade, so I can’t attest to the recent condition of the theater (though recent reports on the closing reference less than ideal conditions in the theater). With 20+ years of cinematic memories there I feel a sense of personal loss, but I also feel the loss for the current and future residents of Mamaroneck who won’t be able to experience seeing a movie there followed by a slice of pizza at Sal’s Pizzeria across the street. At least Sal’s is still there.
Fante’s Inferno celebrates summer movie-going by revisiting the films of the Summer of ’83.
Release date: June 3, 1983
Directed by John Badham; Written by Lawrence Lasker and Walter F. Parkes
Starring Matthew Broderick, Dabney Coleman, John Wood, Barry Corbin, Ally Sheedy
See the trailer here.
Shall we play a game?
30 years later, these words spoken by Joshua still have a chilling resonance.
I’ve seen John Badham’s Wargames at least 20 times since my first screening at the Larchmont Theater in June 1983. It’s one of my favorite films of that particular summer and a perennial favorite since. Watching it again this week reminded me not only of what a great film WarGames is, but also of how it coincided with my Golden Age of computing in the 80’s. Back in 1983 the green text on the black monitor of my school’s TSR-80 was as high tech as it got for me (until I moved up to the Commodore 64 and its Royal Blue start screen), but I really enjoyed the days of playing the Infocom classics (Zork, The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, Planetfall, Ballyhoo), Montezuma’s Revenge and Trolls and Tribulations. WarGames is a time capsule of early 80’s computing, but the film still keeps me on the edge of my seat down to the final minutes. Even with a young Matthew Broderick as the protagonist WarGames doesn’t feel like a teen adventure and holds its own as a well made Cold War thriller.
WarGames begins in the bunker of a nuclear launch site as two launch technicians (played by actors Michael Madsen and John Spencer) arrive for their shift. Their arrival at the launch facility is no different from any two average Joes arriving at the office for a day’s work. But once the alarm sounds, they methodically go through the launch procedures, checking and confirming codes until they learn they must deploy the nuclear warhead. Spencer’s character hesitates, and the scene ends with Madsen’s character holding up his revolver to get his partner to comply with their orders. It’s soon revealed that the launch sequence was a test by higher ups to gauge the success rate of the crews following through on their orders to deploy their missiles. Chief engineer John McKittrick (played by Dabney Coleman) uses this as an opportunity to install a supercomputer (the WOPR – War Operation Plan Response) to take the place of launch technicians and provide a failsafe against the possibility of human hesitation.
I recently took a trip to South Dakota with my faithful sidekick, and coincidentally one of our stops was the Minute Man Nuclear Missile Site near the Badlands national park. Unfortunately the tour of the launch site was booked for the day, but we got to see a picture of it in the visitor center. It looked exactly like the launch facility in the opening scene of WarGames so I asked the Park Ranger on duty that day if any films were shot there after it was “retired.” She advised that the site has never been used as a movie location, but launch facility set created for WarGames was accurate and identical to Minute Man. With the exception of Michael Madsen pulling out a gun on John Spencer, even the launch sequence in the film was accurate.
Enter David Lightman (played by Matthew Broderick), a high school student and computer whiz who would rather use his talents as a hacker than apply himself in school. He purposely gets his teachers to send him to the principal’s office so he can look up the passwords to their network and hack into their system. During dinner with his parents, he learns that computer game company Protovision will be releasing a new line of games. David can’t wait for them to be released, so he attempts to hack into their network and get early access to the games.
After days of research and long nights trying to crack Protovision’s network through a back door in the system, a benign remark by his friend Jennifer (played by Ally Sheedy) provides David with the logon and password he needs to break in. But instead of hacking into Protovision, David has unwittingly hacked into the WOPR (also known as Joshua). He is greeted by Joshua, who thinks that David is his creator Dr. Stephen Falken, and suggests a game of chess. David insists on playing Global Thermonuclear War, however the “game” is actually the program used by the WOPR to simulate nuclear attacks.
David and Jennifer’s game sets off alarms at NORAD, and the staff headed by McKittrick and General Berringer (played by Barry Corbin) believes they are under nuclear attack by the Soviet Union. The “threat” disappears when David shuts off his computer, and NORAD quickly learns that it was only a simulation. They track the break in from David’s hometown of Seattle. David quickly realizes the gravity of the situation when the simulated attack makes the evening news. He disposes of the evidence but is still being contacted by Joshua. The FBI takes David in for questioning at NORAD, but despite his insistence that he thought he was simply playing a game, McKittrick doesn’t believe his story and has him detained on suspicion of espionage. He uses his tech savvy to sneak out of NORAD (which requires a little suspension of disbelief) and sets out to find Dr. Falken (played by the great John Wood) and prevent Joshua from starting a nuclear war.
What still makes the story accessible despite the dated equipment is Badham and Broderick’s representation of the fun and blank slate of the early days of home computing without dumbing it down with unrealistic graphics. One of the caveats I’ve always had with computer/tech themed films is how the functionality of computers, networks, etc. are “jazzed up” to make computers more cinematic. There’s a little bit of that with regard to David’s conversations with Joshua, but the simple typed lines of text typed onto an old school monitor ensure that WarGames doesn’t overachieve with regard to the functionality of early computers.
I already had a DVD copy of WarGames when the 25th Anniversary DVD was released in 2008. Normally I would have been happy with my first copy, but this new edition had a Making Of featurette that made the purchase a no-brainer. Despite my appreciation for WarGames and its rank among my all time favorites, I hadn’t actually researched the making of the film.
I didn’t know that John Badham had replaced Martin Brest (director of Scent of a Woman and Meet Joe Black) early in the film’s production. Badham had received acclaim for the era defining 70’s classic Saturday Night Fever and had another hit film, Blue Thunder starring Roy Scheider released one month prior to WarGames. Brest had Broderick and Sheedy initially playing their roles with a darker tone, but fortunately Badham lightened it up. The beginning of the film needed the infusion of teenage innocence and cluelessness in order for the story to unfold more effectively. The playfulness in Broderick and Sheedy’s early scenes really add to Broderick’s performance when McKittrick’s mistrust and threats hit David in the gut.
But one piece of information about the production that truly blew me away was how the producers had originally considered John Lennon to play the role of Dr. Stephen Falken. While I think WarGames was near perfect as is, it would have been amazing to see how Lennon would have played the role. Screenwriters Lawrence Lasker and Walter F. Parkes’ tight story combined with Badham’s direction and a fantastic, believable cast takes the audience on a great ride down to the final moments of the film.
WarGames made me and my brother beg our father to buy our first computer. I still remember the day he drove us to Caldors department store and completely trusted us to make that purchase without balking at the price. The Commodore 64 required a keyboard and disk drive purchased separately, and your TV would be the monitor. The salesman asked if we also wanted the modem to go along with it. I instantly thought of David Lightman using his modem to hack into Protovision. Fortunately we didn’t add the modem to our purchase and we stayed at Defcon 5.
From the time I was six years old I was quoting movies. My teachers seriously thought something was wrong with me.
The first movie I remember seeing in a theater was Jaws. It had been re-released in my hometown as part of a double feature with Jaws 2. This was 1978 (back when our theater had only one screen). I was six years old and I can truly say it didn’t make me afraid of going into the water…I couldn’t swim (still can’t). My father took me and my older brother to see it one afternoon, and by the time we got home I was quoting Roy Scheider’s line just before he fired his M1 rifle into the oxygen tank that (SPOILER ALERT) blew up the great white.
“Smile, you son of a…” BLAM!
That line was part of my description of Jaws to Mrs. Farrell, my grandparents’ upstairs tenant, when she asked me about the movie. I may have substituted another B-word for “blam” to explain to her what Chief Brody was really trying to convey. Needless to say she was surprised by my vocabulary and retention skills at that age. Hers was the first of many baffled looks and shaken heads that would be a theme through most of my childhood.
When my father used to take us to the movies, more often than not we would arrive five to ten minutes after the movie started. We’d sit through the film, the entire credits, wait another twenty minutes in our seats in the empty theater, then watch the movie from the beginning of the next screening. Once the movie reached the part that was playing when we first arrived, Pop would get up and say, “Okay, we can go now.”
Some of my favorites back then were: Jaws, Star Wars, The Empire Strikes Back, Flash Gordon, Excalibur, The Big Red One, Time Bandits, and the only move I’ve seen three times in a theater: Superman The Movie.
The first comic book I remember owning was The Amazing Spider-Man #175 (December, 1977). The Punisher and Spider-Man were teamed up against a villain called The Hitman. The cover by Ross Andru showed The Hitman pointing his rifle at The Punisher who was kneeling at the edge of the Statue of Liberty’s crown holding up an injured Spider-Man, who in turn was holding up J. Jonah Jameson. My brother had picked it off of the spinner rack at the local convenience store and I remember just sitting on the floor of my grandparents’ house staring at that cover, trying to figure out the storyline from that one image. How did they end up on top of the Statue of Liberty? How would they get out of this situation (with Spider-Man’s arm injured, no less)? Was The Punisher a good guy or a bad guy? The story inside didn’t interest me. At age five I probably wouldn’t have understood most of it anyway. I just immersed myself in that cover, creating story upon story in my young mind. It had tension. The bad guy had the upper hand, but Spider-Man had to get them out of this. God, I love the Bronze Age.
Some of my favorite comic books of the 70s and 80s: The Uncanny X-Men (especially the Claremont/Byrne/Austin and Claremont/Smith/Wiacek runs), The Fantastic Four (the Byrne run), The Amazing Spider-Man, Marvel Team Up, Star Wars, G.I. Combat, Sgt. Rock, and Cerebus.
Please read the title of this post again: There Are No Nerds or Geeks Here.
This blog won’t be a forum for rants about how George Lucas ruined the Holy Trilogy with unnecessary CGI, whether Han shot Greedo first, or for fighting the stereotypes about comic book readers. It’s for the less rabid folks like me that appreciate movies and comic books and have an even greater appreciation for the creators that brought them to us. I’ve had the pleasure and honor of interviewing a few of them. Those interviews will be posted soon, along with reviews of lesser known movies, some classic comic book storylines revisited, and some posts on my latest passion: original comic book art. I’ll try to go light on the nostalgia (but I can’t make any promises), and even lighter on the snark.